Lines of Thought

Can an algorithm deny your care?

Who is allowed to use AI to approve or refuse treatment coverage, and what human check is required?

Federal health agencies are expanding AI in Medicare review while AI labs sell prior-authorisation tools to insurers. States are responding with laws requiring a licensed clinician to make every denial, setting up a clash with federal efforts to pre-empt state AI rules.

  1. PolicyHealthUS
    HHS publishes department-wide AI strategy built on a 'OneHHS' platform

    HHS commits to AI across CMS and other agencies.

  2. ProgrammeHealthUS
    Medicare starts WISeR, an AI-assisted prior-authorisation pilot in six states

    Traditional Medicare begins AI-assisted prior authorisation, with vendors paid from savings.

  3. LaunchHealthUS
    Anthropic launches Claude for Healthcare with HIPAA-ready tools for providers and payers

    Frontier labs package prior-authorisation and claims-appeal tools for payers and providers.

  4. Rule · SupersededUS-CO
    Colorado AI Act (SB 24-205)

    Colorado's general AI Act already treats health-care decisions as consequential.

    Also on Washington vs the states on AI rules, Who audits the hiring algorithm?

  5. Rule changeHealthUS-WA US
    Washington law says only a licensed clinician can deny prior-authorisation requests

    Washington and six other states require a human clinician behind every AI-assisted denial.

  6. Rule · Partly in forceUS-CA
    CCPA ADMT regulations

    California's automated decision-making rules add notice and opt-out duties.

    Also on Who audits the hiring algorithm?

  7. Rule · In forceUS
    State AI law preemption EO

    Federal pressure to pre-empt state AI laws could test these state protections.

    Also on Transparency, not licensing

Where this line could go next

Connected developments not on this line